Moriswala Musafirkhana Case – Dawat ni Amanat ane Legal Jeet
Moriswala Musafirkhana Case – Dawat ni Amanat ane Legal Jeet
Har daur ni fitnat Syedna al-Dai al-Mutlaq ne target karva ne, Dawat-e-Haqq ni sharaiyat par sawal uthavva ni koshish karti aayi chhe. Pan, har fitna ni andar Syedna RA ni hikmat, foresight, ane shari’at ni roshni thi Dawat ne qanooni jeet hasal thai chhe.
Ek aavi misaal chhe Moriswala Musafirkhana Case, je Mumbai ma Moriswala Musafirkhana je Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA taraf si waqf property hati, ema trust position defend karva no mukadmo hato.
📜 Case nu Background
Moriswala Musafirkhana ek guest house chhe je Mumbai na strategic location par, Bohra mumineen na stay ane ibadat mate banavama aayu chhe.
-
Aa property Dawoodi Bohra Jamaat taraf si, Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA ne waqf kari deva ma aavi hati shari’at mutabiq, Imam uz Zamaan AS ni niyyat thi.
-
Pachi ek local individual (je “Bohra public interest” ne represent kare chhe) court ma case file kido.
Teno main ilzaam:
“Moriswala Musafirkhana ni property par Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA ne niji control chhe, je public waqf chhe, community property chhe – ye individual under nahi aavi sake.”
⚖️ Dawat ni Position – Sabar, Daleel ane Shari’at
Dawat taraf si court ma je dalel mukva ma aavi:
-
Property Imam uz Zamaan AS ni taraf si waqf kari deva ma aavi, public charity na naam par nathi.
-
Community-specific religious trust – Dawoodi Bohra denomination ni ibadat, rehva ane deeni kaamon mate.
-
Sole amanat ane zimmedari Dai al-Mutlaq ni – je wakil chhe Imam uz Zamaan AS na.
📚 Court ma Daleel ane Legal Defense
Petitioners taraf si court ma mukvama aaveli vaato:
-
“Musafirkhana jamaat na paisa si banavama aavi – public interest ni property.”
-
“Syedna SAHEB ne individual trustee ya controller banavu unconstitutional chhe.”
-
“Property ni management secular terms ma karvi joiye.”
Dawat ni taraf si response:
-
Property shari’at mutabiq waqf thai chhe jema niyyat, maqsad ane usage strictly religious chhe.
-
Dawoodi Bohras ek distinct religious denomination – Article 26 of Indian Constitution ma religious institutions par complete control.
-
Moriswala Musafirkhana religious-private trust chhe – secular terms thi operate nai thai sake.
✅ Court no Faislo
Court ye detailed hearing pachi decision aapo:
-
Moriswala Musafirkhana religious trust chhe – Dawoodi Bohra community specific.
-
Dai al-Mutlaq, as religious trustee, full legal authority management par.
-
Property public waqf nathi – Waqf Board ke secular body ne koi haq ya audit power nathi.
-
Petitioners no claim misguided ane legally untenable.
🌟 Case ni Significance
Moriswala Musafirkhana Case thi:
-
Mumineen ne yaqeen thayo ke Syedna RA ni amanat qanooni taur par secure chhe.
-
Indian judiciary religious freedom ane property rights ni roshni ma interpret kare chhe.
-
Dawat ni shari’at-based waqf system ne legal mohr lagi.
Syedna RA ni naseehat:
“Mumineen ni mal-o-jaidad, Imam uz Zamaan ni amanat chhe. Dai ul Mutlaq Imam no wakeel chhe – duniyaavi court ne aa silsila ma dakhal nathi.”
🕊️ Natijo ane Mumineen Mate Sabaq
-
Community property koi secular board ni under nathi – Dai ni amanat chhe.
-
Har fitna ne shari’at ane qanoon thi jawab male chhe.
-
Mumineen hamesha yaqeen sathe kehvu joiye:
“Jem Syedna RA kahe, tem Dawat chalse – Imam ni raza thi, na ke duniya na pressure thi.”
✍️ Written by: Mohammed
📍 Ahmedabad, Gujarat
📚 Series: Dawat na Qanooni Muqaddamaat ni Jeet
📧 mohammedvelan5@gmail.com
Read More Blogs:
